SwapRadar

Paysmaker review

Updated 22 September 2026 · compiled by the editorial team from the services' own pages

P Paysmaker is an instant exchange. It scores 95/100 and sits at place 3 in the ranking. Below is what the service publishes about itself, with the page it was taken from.

Coins300+
Accountnot needed
Ratecan be fixed
Working since2021
Support24/7 chat
We earn a commission when you open an exchange through the links on this page. It does not change your rate and does not move anyone up the list — the ranking follows the published method. One service in the table is our own: it is marked «our service», scored by the same criteria and can be checked the same way. How this site is funded

What it offers

Account neededno
Fixed rateavailable
Networkswide
Support24/7 chat
Rules stated up frontyes
Coins supported300+
Working since2021
Feenot published by the service
Minimum swapnot published by the service
Swap timenot published by the service
Verificationnot published by the service
Limitsnot published by the service

Checked on the service pages: https://paysmaker.com/ — 2026-09-22. Facts only: numbers that a service does not publish are not invented here.

How Paysmaker works

Paysmaker quotes its own price and swaps against its own liquidity: one screen, one address to send to, no order book and no balance kept for you. What you compare between such services is the quote, the minimum and how they behave when a transfer sticks.

Support answers in chat around the clock — on a stuck transfer that is the difference between minutes and a day.

The service lists 300+ coins, so rare pairs are more likely to be there than on a short list, and it has been running since 2021 — 5 years, which covers at least two full market cycles.

Paysmaker next to SimpleSwap

The two sit on the same score in the table. Where they actually differ: support (24/7 chat against email); the coin list (300+ against 2800+); time on the market (since 2021 against 2018). Everything else the method scores is the same for both, which is why the gap is what it is and not larger.

Where the score comes from

CriterionPointsWhy
No account needed30/30A swap that needs no sign-up leaves no balance to freeze.
Fixed rate available25/25A locked quote protects the payout when the network is slow.
Networks covered20/20Cheap networks (TRC-20, BEP-20) decide the final amount.
Support reachable15/15A stuck transfer is resolved by people, not by a status page.
Rules stated up front10/10AML and limits said before the transfer, not after.
Coins supported4/8A pair that is not listed cannot be swapped at any rate.
Years in operation4/6A service that survived two market cycles has a track record.

Strong

  • No account, no balance to freeze
  • Rate can be locked before you send
  • Wide network coverage, including cheap ones
  • Rules and limits stated before the transfer

Weak

  • The fee is not published — you see it only inside the quote
  • The minimum is not published either: it shows up in the form
  • Swap time is not stated anywhere, so there is nothing to hold them to

Open Paysmaker

Who Paysmaker fits

Suits a one-off swap where you do not want to open anything: Paysmaker moves coins from your wallet to your wallet and holds nothing in between, and with 300+ coins listed the odd pair is usually there.

Does not fit if you need a venue for regular trading with an order book — this is a swap service, not an exchange desk.

Support here is 24/7 chat. On a stuck transfer that is the difference between an answer in minutes and an answer tomorrow, which is why it is scored.

Where to check Paysmaker yourself

Everything in the tables above comes from https://paysmaker.com/, read on 2026-09-22. Open it and look for «account», «verification» and «fixed rate» — those three answers are the bulk of the score. The rest is visible on the quote screen: start a swap and stop before sending, nothing leaves your wallet while you look.

The full five-minute routine is on how we check. If something here is out of date, the table is wrong and not the service — write and it is corrected.